On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:21:45PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >
> > - usb@12000000 {
> > + usb_dwc3 {
> > compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-dwusb3";
> > clocks = <&clock CLK_USB3>;
> > clock-names = "usbdrd30";
>
> The ePAPR document says that "The name of a node should be somewhat generic,
> reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model"
>
> So I wonder if this shouldn't be instead:
>
> usb_dwc3: usb {
There are already nodes with 'usb' name:
ehci: usb@12110000 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ehci";
...
}
ohci: usb@12120000 {
compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci";
}
Having nodes with the same name but some with address some not, should
work (none should be overridden)... but looks a little bit weird.
Anyway I am fine with both.
> Although it seems that not all DT bindings follow this convention so probably
> the name in your patch is correct.
>
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
Thanks for review and comments. I already spotted the 'memory' node
issue so I won't be replying to you with acknowledging comments. :)
BR,
Krzysztof
