It occurs to me that kvm could benefit greatly from dyntick:

dyntick-enabled host:
- generate virtual interrupts at whatever HZ the guest programs its timers, be it 100, 250, 1000 or whatever
- avoid expensive vmexits due to useless timer interrupts

dyntick-enabled guest:
- reduce the load on the host when the guest is idling
  (currently an idle guest consumes a few percent cpu)

What are the current plans wrt dyntick?  Is it planned for 2.6.21?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to