Bunch of sysctl bugs:
* use of proc_dostring with ->strategy==NULL instead of systcl_string.
* use of sysctl_intvec with NULL ->extra1 and ->extra2 (harmless, but silly).
Patch follows. Please, apply.
Cheers,
Al
PS: that's the first part of large sequence and I'm not sure that everything
will go for 2.4, but I'll try to feed that stuff in reasonable order. The
final goal: kernfs. As in "dcache-based, sysctl(2) done via path_walk(),
no bloody static initializers, less crap in procfs". I _hope_ that it will
go in 2.4.<something>, but even if it's 2.5 fodder there are obvious bugs
that can be fixed without any API changes.
diff -urN rc10/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c rc10-sysctl/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
--- rc10/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c Thu Nov 2 22:39:09 2000
+++ rc10-sysctl/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c Thu Nov 2 22:45:45 2000
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_DIVERT
{NET_CORE_DIVERT_VERSION, "divert_version",
(void *)sysctl_divert_version, 32, 0444, NULL,
- &proc_dostring},
+ &proc_dostring, sysctl_dostring},
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_DIVERT */
#endif /* CONFIG_NET */
{ 0 }
diff -urN rc10/net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c
rc10-sysctl/net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c
--- rc10/net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c Thu Apr 27 22:01:29 2000
+++ rc10-sysctl/net/decnet/sysctl_net_decnet.c Thu Nov 2 22:48:55 2000
@@ -345,8 +345,7 @@
&min_decnet_dst_gc_interval, &max_decnet_dst_gc_interval},
{NET_DECNET_DEBUG_LEVEL, "debug", &decnet_debug_level,
sizeof(int), 0644,
- NULL, &proc_dointvec, &sysctl_intvec, NULL,
- NULL, NULL},
+ NULL, &proc_dointvec},
{0}
};
diff -urN rc10/net/khttpd/sysctl.c rc10-sysctl/net/khttpd/sysctl.c
--- rc10/net/khttpd/sysctl.c Sun Sep 12 21:16:55 1999
+++ rc10-sysctl/net/khttpd/sysctl.c Thu Nov 2 22:48:03 2000
@@ -83,9 +83,6 @@
NULL,
proc_dostring,
&sysctl_string,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_STOP,
"stop",
@@ -94,10 +91,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_START,
"start",
@@ -106,10 +99,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_UNLOAD,
"unload",
@@ -118,10 +107,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_THREADS,
"threads",
@@ -130,10 +115,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_MAXCONNECT,
"maxconnect",
@@ -142,10 +123,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_SLOPPYMIME,
"sloppymime",
@@ -154,10 +131,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_CLIENTPORT,
"clientport",
@@ -166,10 +139,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_PERMREQ,
"perm_required",
@@ -178,10 +147,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_PERMFORBID,
"perm_forbid",
@@ -190,10 +155,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_LOGGING,
"logging",
@@ -202,10 +163,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_SERVERPORT,
"serverport",
@@ -214,10 +171,6 @@
0644,
NULL,
proc_dointvec,
- &sysctl_intvec,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
{ NET_KHTTPD_DYNAMICSTRING,
"dynamic",
@@ -227,21 +180,19 @@
NULL,
proc_dosecurestring,
&sysctl_SecureString,
- NULL,
- NULL,
- NULL
},
- {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0} };
+ {0}
+};
static ctl_table khttpd_dir_table[] = {
{NET_KHTTPD, "khttpd", NULL, 0, 0555, khttpd_table,0,0,0,0,0},
- {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
+ {0}
};
static ctl_table khttpd_root_table[] = {
{CTL_NET, "net", NULL, 0, 0555, khttpd_dir_table,0,0,0,0,0},
- {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}
+ {0}
};
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
