On 03/24/2016 06:11 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Currently, we check cpuidle_ops.suspend every time when entering a
low-power idle state. But this check could be avoided in this hot path
by moving it into arm_cpuidle_init() to reduce arm_cpuidle_suspend()
overhead a bit.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com>
---
  arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 8 ++------
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
index f108d8f..bf68d49 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
@@ -52,13 +52,9 @@ int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
   */
  int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
  {
-       int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
        int cpu = smp_processor_id();

-       if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
-               ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
-
-       return ret;
+       return cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
  }

I agree with the optimization but, same comment than the previous patch, it should be handled in arm_cpuidle_read_ops.

--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Reply via email to