On 16-03-16, 14:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> No, it won't. This might be applicable to other governors, but not to
> "performance" (look at what it does on _START instead of just
> guessing).
>
> > So, your patch break things for sure.
>
> I'm not actually sure it breaks anything.
>
> Theoretically, it may, but practically? Is there any system out there
> where it makes any difference?
AFAIU, this patch will break currently working governors.
-> cpufreq_resume()
-> cpufreq_governor_performance(START)
-> __cpufreq_driver_target(target_freq = policy->max)
//policy->cur is already set to policy->max before suspend.
if (target_freq == policy->cur)
return 0;
And so, the real frequency stays to 500 MHz and policy->cur contains 1 GHz.
--
viresh
