> -----Original Message----- > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 4:08 PM > To: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>; KY Srinivasan > <k...@microsoft.com> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; > oher...@suse.com; jbottom...@parallels.com; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; > a...@canonical.com; vkuzn...@redhat.com; jasow...@redhat.com; > h...@suse.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Support manual scan of FC hosts on > Hyper-V > > On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 18:34 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > > > > > > "KY" == KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com> writes: > > > > KY> How would I get the sysfs files under fc_host if I don't use the > > FC > > KY> transport. The customer scripts expect these sysfs files. > > > > Right, but I was interested in finding out why they need those > > files. And whether an alternative to the FC transport would be a > > better solution. > > If it's just the wwn file (or a set of other values), we might be able > to separate that bit out of the FC transport class so you can use it > independently ... do you have a full list of the files being used?
Wwn files are what we can support on Hyper-V and that is what I want to support (to address customer requirements). Regards, K. Y
