David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:50:15 -0800 (PST) > > > David, there really *is* something screwy in netfilter. > > Sure, but from what I can see this bug appears unrelated to the one in > kernel bugzilla #7781 that we've been discussing the past few days. > > First of all, the nf conntrack paths won't be used by normal > users until 2.6.20-rc1 or so. The bz #7781 report is against > 2.6.19 and all those backtraces have IP conntrack in them, not > nf conntrack. > > So what are we compiling with here btw, gcc-4.1? > > I want to rule the compiler out in this and the bz #7781 case > so that we can look at the code seriously.
The first crash was with gcc 4.1.1, but now I recompiled the kernel with "gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-56.fc5)" and I can still reproduce the same crash. The backtrace looks the same, although the addresses are obviously different. Some hand copied data from the oops: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 1d075089 eax: cc671e5c ebx: d58569a0 ecx: d58569a0 edx: 00000014 esi: 1d075021 edi: 00000001 ebp: cc671df0 esp: cc671ddc ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068 EIP: ipv4_conntrack_help+0x8e/0x93 -- Peter Osterlund - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://web.telia.com/~u89404340 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
