On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 13:12 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> fs/proc/generic.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.19/fs/proc/generic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19.orig/fs/proc/generic.c
> +++ linux-2.6.19/fs/proc/generic.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ static void proc_kill_inodes(struct proc
> /*
> * Actually it's a partial revoke().
> */
> - filevec_add_drain_all();
> lock_list_for_each_entry(filp, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_llist) {
> struct dentry * dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
> struct inode * inode;
> @@ -738,6 +737,8 @@ void remove_proc_entry(const char *name,
> break;
> }
> spin_unlock(&proc_subdir_lock);
> +
> + filevec_add_drain_all();
> out:
> return;
> }
Well, no. Draining after the inspect 'all' loop doesn't make sense, but
looking at 2.6.20-rc3-rt0 remove_proc_entry() looks sane.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
