On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 05:43:39PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote: > However, the OOM killer behaves in strange ways, it seems. In the 2 "make Fair enough as there isn't an oom killer in the kernel you're running :). So it can kill unlucky tasks as well. Since nobody cares to implement it, for 2.4.x on my TODO list there's an alternative oom killer based on the task fault rate. (btw, make sure you're using the -7 revision of the VM-global patch, as it includes the same MM corruption bugfix that is been included into 18pre18) Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Looking for better 2.2-based VM (do_try_to_free_pag... Yann Dirson
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-based VM (do_try_to... Miquel van Smoorenburg
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-based VM (do_try_to... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-based VM (do_tr... Yann Dirson
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-based VM (d... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-based V... Rik van Riel
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-ba... Yann Dirson
- Re: Looking for better 2.... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Looking for bette... Yann Dirson
- Re: Looking for bette... Yann Dirson
- Re: Looking for bette... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Looking for bette... Yann Dirson
- Re: Looking for better 2.... Ingo Oeser
- Re: Looking for bette... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: Looking for better 2.2-based V... J . A . Magallon