> for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is > correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode > update. > > Perhaps Richard can clarify this? Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems wisest to test for == not >. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Andi Kleen
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 kuznet
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Miles Lane
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Tigran Aivazian
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Tigran Aivazian
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 M.H.VanLeeuwen
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 David Ford
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 M.H.VanLeeuwen
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 David Ford
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Vitezslav Samel
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Mikael Pettersson
- RE: Linux-2.4.0-test10 CRADOCK, Christopher
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 M.H.VanLeeuwen
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 Ragnar Hojland Espinosa