On 02/23/2016 01:49 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > So I could really respect a patch header line that said: > tree abcdef0123456789...0123456789abcdef > > Where the numbers where the truncated tree hash before and after a patch > was applied. That would seem to give a little bit of extra sanity > checking in the application of git diffs as well. >
I would rather have the untruncated base tree ID. The truncated file IDs already provide the verification component, and it is *way* cheaper to search for an untruncated ID. -hpa