On 23/02/16 16:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:42:40PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > > > > index 9503d59..0ee0ec2 100644 > > > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > > > @@ -2432,7 +2432,7 @@ static int dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, > > > > int policy, u64 new_bw = dl_policy(policy) ? to_ratio(period, > > > > runtime) : 0; int cpus, err = -1; > > > > > > > > - if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw) > > > > + if (task_has_dl_policy(p) && new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw) > > > > return 0; > > > > > > This hunk actually fixes issue 2) mentioned above, so I think it should > > > be committed in a short time (independently from the rest of the > > > patch). And maybe is a good candidate for backporting to stable kernels? > > > > > > > Yes, this is a sensible fix per se. I can split it and send it > > separately. > > Did you ever send that? >
No, I didn't. Will do ASAP. Thanks, - Juri
