From: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>

Commit

  a18a0f6850d4 ("x86, microcode: Don't initialize microcode code on paravirt")

added a paravirt test in microcode_init(), primarily to avoid making
mc_bp_resume()->load_ucode_ap()->check_loader_disabled_ap() calls
because on 32-bit kernels this callchain ends up using __pa_nodebug()
macro which is invalid for Xen PV guests.

A subsequent commit

  fbae4ba8c4a3 ("x86, microcode: Reload microcode on resume")

eliminated this callchain thus making a18a0f6850d4 unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: x86-ml <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index faec7120c508..86ec92a0bbbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ int __init microcode_init(void)
        struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
        int error;
 
-       if (paravirt_enabled() || dis_ucode_ldr)
+       if (dis_ucode_ldr)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
-- 
2.3.5

Reply via email to