Hello Rafael,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:11:54AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[..snip..]
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_performance.c
> @@ -33,10 +33,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_performance(
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE_MODULE
> -static
> -#endif
> -struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_performance = {
> +static struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_performance = {
> .name = "performance",
> .governor = cpufreq_governor_performance,
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> @@ -52,6 +49,19 @@ static void __exit cpufreq_gov_performan
> cpufreq_unregister_governor(&cpufreq_gov_performance);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE
> +struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_default_governor(void)
> +{
> + return &cpufreq_gov_performance;
> +}
> +#endif
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_PERFORMANCE_MODULE
Shouldn't this be #ifdef ?
> +struct cpufreq_governor *cpufreq_fallback_governor(void)
> +{
> + return &cpufreq_gov_performance;
> +}
> +#endif
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
