Hi !
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:21:59PM -0700, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Hi folks, I've got an old PC (Pentium 133 MHz, 64 MB RAM, no swap)
> running Linux 2.4.32, and lately I've been getting kernel BUGs like this:
>
> kernel: kernel BUG at slab.c:1582!
> kernel: invalid operand: 0000
> kernel: CPU: 0
> kernel: EIP: 0010:[kmem_cache_free+105/624] Not tainted
> kernel: EFLAGS: 00010293
> kernel: eax: c10b7354 ebx: 00003ef0 ecx: 0002b450 edx: c100001c
> kernel: esi: 000ad140 edi: c3ef0634 ebp: 00000023 esp: c10c3f4c
> kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
> kernel: Process kswapd (pid: 4, stackpage=c10c3000)
> kernel: Stack: c10b7354 c2c13e3c c3ef0634 c036dd3c 00000023 c01426ca
> c10b7354 c3ef0634
> kernel: 0000003c 000001d0 00000009 c0232f18 c01429b5 00000379
> c012a7b8 00000006
> kernel: 000001d0 00000000 00000000 c0232f18 00000001 c10c2000
> 00000000 c012a947
> kernel: Call Trace: [prune_dcache+266/320]
> [shrink_dcache_memory+37/64] [try_to_free_pages_zone+104/208]
> [kswapd_balance_pgdat+87/160] [kswapd_balance+22/48]
> kernel: [kswapd+143/176] [_stext+0/48] [arch_kernel_thread+35/48]
> [kswapd+0/176]
> kernel:
> kernel: Code: 0f 0b 2e 06 7a c0 20 c0 9c 8f 04 24 fa 3b 1d 20 82 28 c0 89
>
>
> The system is a bit tight on memory, but /proc/meminfo reports MemFree +
> Buffers + Cached > 10 MB.
>
> After kswapd stepped on the BUG, it happened several more times by
> different processes and different code paths, but always ending with this:
>
> Call Trace: [prune_dcache+266/320] [shrink_dcache_memory+37/64]
> [try_to_free_pages_zone+104/208] [balance_classzone+76/560]
> [__alloc_pages+363/624]
>
>
> The BUG is this one:
>
> /**
> * kmem_cache_free - Deallocate an object
> * @cachep: The cache the allocation was from.
> * @objp: The previously allocated object.
> *
> * Free an object which was previously allocated from this
> * cache.
> */
> void kmem_cache_free (kmem_cache_t *cachep, void *objp)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> #if DEBUG
> CHECK_PAGE(virt_to_page(objp));
> if (cachep != GET_PAGE_CACHE(virt_to_page(objp)))
> BUG();
> #endif
>
> local_irq_save(flags);
> __kmem_cache_free(cachep, objp);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
>
> So prune_dcache() gets called to free up some memory, but then it hands
> kmem_cache_free an inconsistent object to free? Is this indicative of
> memory corruption?
Could be. Especially on such a machine, it was the era of unreliable
memory busses between RAM, chipsets and CPUs, unreliable cache sticks,
unreliable RAM sticks, and unreliable voltage regulators causing
lockups and cache corruption. I don't think the problem is related to
low memory because you should get OOM messages if this was the case.
Have you tried running memtest on this machine ? I would bet that it
could find errors. I do still run a P133 which stayed up for 2 years
before the mains was cut, but I've encountered many of them showing
frequent lockups in the past, particularly on those with a small
cache card plugged into a special slot close to the CPU. You may try
to disable the cache in the BIOS, because I suspect that performance
is less of a problem for you on such a machine than reliability.
Slightly increasing the CPU voltage might also compensate for an aging
regulator.
Best regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
