On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:08:28PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Monday 08 February 2016 08:25 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 08:07:22PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>Before removing irq domains, it is require to unmap all > >>mapped interrupt from that domain. Currently there is API > >>to map the interrupt on chip as regmap_irq_get_virq() for > >>creating mapping. Add equivalent API to dispose the mapped > >>irq in irq domains. > >This makes no sense to me. Why would you ever want to unmap the > >interrupts separately to destroying the domain > This is the requirement from irq_domain_remove(). This is what we have in > irq_domain_remove(): > kernel/irq/irqdomain.c > I am adding the API equivalent to regmap_irq_get_virq() to unmap virtual irq > here. This does not explain why anyone would ever want to use this interface (which was my question), why would anyone ever want to do this as a separate step? > >and why would you ever > >want to destroy the domain without unmapping the interrupts? > That's exactlly we are trying to do, unmap interrupt in client level before > destroying domain. Again, why would any client ever want to skip this step?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
