On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:07:32PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > From: San Mehat <s...@google.com> > > As it turns out, the CONFIG_PROFILING interfaces leak a > task struct if the notifier chain returns NOTIFY_OK.. doh. > > This patch reworks lowmemkiller to use the new generic task > free notifier chain. > > Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-t...@android.com> > Cc: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > Signed-off-by: San Mehat <s...@google.com> > [jstultz: Commit subject tweak] > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c > b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c > index 8b5a4a8..806643d 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c > @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/swap.h> > #include <linux/rcupdate.h> > -#include <linux/profile.h> > #include <linux/notifier.h> > > static u32 lowmem_debug_level = 1; > -- > 1.9.1
The changelog comment seems a bit "odd" when looking at the patch here. Is the patch really correct? The changelog? totally confused, greg k-h
