On 04-02-16, 17:01, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > Yes it does! Thank you for the explanation. > > So, the CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY is really > CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_TUNERS_PER_POLICY. Can we change the name to > reflect the intent?
Hmm, we might wanna do that. Though we are quite busy (screwed up) at the moment, will do that later on :) -- viresh