On 04-02-16, 17:01, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> Yes it does! Thank you for the explanation.
> 
> So, the CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY is really
> CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_TUNERS_PER_POLICY. Can we change the name to
> reflect the intent?

Hmm, we might wanna do that. Though we are quite busy (screwed up) at
the moment, will do that later on :)

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to