On 02/02/2016 11:21 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
This needs some more description in the commit message.

--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
[...]
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.cs_base = 0;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.cs_limit = ~0u;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.cs_ar = 0xc9b;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.ds_base = 0;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.ds_limit = ~0u;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.ds_ar = 0xc93;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.es_base = 0;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.es_limit = ~0u;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.es_ar = 0xc93;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.ss_base = 0;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.ss_limit = ~0u;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.ss_ar = 0xc93;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.tr_base = 0;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.tr_limit = 0xff;
+               hctxt->cpu_regs.x86_32.tr_ar = 0x8b;
Lots of hard-coded values here.  Should this be #defined somewhere?

We also don't need to set bases to zero since hctxt is kzalloc'd. I'll remove that and add a comment.

As for macros --- I couldn't find the bits defined symbolically anywhere and since this is the only place this is used the macros would be local here.

-boris

Reply via email to