Commit 955ef4833574 ("cpufreq: Drop rwsem lock around
CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT") dropped these because of some ABBA lockup
issues.

The previous commit has fixed them all and we don't need to drop these
locks anymore.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 -----
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 4 ----
 2 files changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e979ec78b695..5f7e24567e0e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -2155,10 +2155,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy,
                        return ret;
                }
 
-               up_write(&policy->rwsem);
                ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
-               down_write(&policy->rwsem);
-
                if (ret) {
                        pr_err("%s: Failed to Exit Governor: %s (%d)\n",
                               __func__, old_gov->name, ret);
@@ -2174,9 +2171,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy,
                if (!ret)
                        goto out;
 
-               up_write(&policy->rwsem);
                __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
-               down_write(&policy->rwsem);
        }
 
        /* new governor failed, so re-start old one */
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 88a4215125bc..79b87cebaa9c 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -100,10 +100,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
         * - Any routine that will write to the policy structure and/or may 
take away
         *   the policy altogether (eg. CPU hotplug), will hold this lock in 
write
         *   mode before doing so.
-        *
-        * Additional rules:
-        * - Lock should not be held across
-        *     __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
         */
        struct rw_semaphore     rwsem;
 
-- 
2.7.0.79.gdc08a19

Reply via email to