* Wei Tang <tang...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote: > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning to fork.c: > > WARNING: sizeof sig->rlim should be sizeof(sig->rlim) > > Signed-off-by: Wei Tang <tang...@cmss.chinamobile.com> > --- > kernel/fork.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c > index 2e391c7..30e04d2 100644 > --- a/kernel/fork.c > +++ b/kernel/fork.c > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clone_flags, > struct task_struct *tsk) > sig->real_timer.function = it_real_fn; > > task_lock(current->group_leader); > - memcpy(sig->rlim, current->signal->rlim, sizeof sig->rlim); > + memcpy(sig->rlim, current->signal->rlim, sizeof(sig->rlim)); > task_unlock(current->group_leader); > > posix_cpu_timers_init_group(sig);
So there's over 1,000 such occurances in the kernel and we do not need this drip-drip churn... If anyone feels strongly about accepting such patches, then the right solution is to create a Coccinelle semantic patch to run over the whole kernel and get over with the churn once and for all. Thanks, Ingo