* Wei Tang <tang...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:

> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning to fork.c:
> 
> WARNING: sizeof sig->rlim should be sizeof(sig->rlim)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Tang <tang...@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
>  kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 2e391c7..30e04d2 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clone_flags, 
> struct task_struct *tsk)
>       sig->real_timer.function = it_real_fn;
>  
>       task_lock(current->group_leader);
> -     memcpy(sig->rlim, current->signal->rlim, sizeof sig->rlim);
> +     memcpy(sig->rlim, current->signal->rlim, sizeof(sig->rlim));
>       task_unlock(current->group_leader);
>  
>       posix_cpu_timers_init_group(sig);

So there's over 1,000 such occurances in the kernel and we do not need this 
drip-drip churn...

If anyone feels strongly about accepting such patches, then the right solution 
is 
to create a Coccinelle semantic patch to run over the whole kernel and get over 
with the churn once and for all.

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to