On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > > LINK_FIRST is processed in the order it is specified, so a.o will be > linked before z.o when both are present. See the patch. So why don't you do the same thing for obj-y, then? Why can't you do LINK_FIRST=$(obj-y) and be done with it? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: test10-pre7 Horst von Brand
- Re: test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
- Re: test10-pre7 Rusty Russell
- Re: test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
- Re: test10-pre7 Keith Owens
- Re: test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
- Re: test10-pre7 Keith Owens
- Re: test10-pre7 Russell King
- Re: test10-pre7 Keith Owens
- Re: test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
- Re: test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
- Re: test10-pre7 Russell King
- Re: test10-pre7 Linus Torvalds
- Re: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering) Randy Dunlap
- Re: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering) Jeff Garzik
- Re: test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
- Re: test10-pre7 Keith Owens
- Re: test10-pre7 Alan Cox
- Re: test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson
- Re: test10-pre7 John Alvord
- Re: test10-pre7 Peter Samuelson