> > You obviously completely ignored this part of my reply: > >> > If we follow your argumentation we need another gazillion of >> > conditional >> > breakpoints in the kernel
Actually, I was not suggesting this at all. But now that you mention it, there is already a BUG() macro that inserts a a two byte u2DA instruction instead of a one byte CC (int3) breakpoint instruction that would be a good candidate for setting int3 breakpoints since the code is already there and its a macro change build option. Jeff
