> -----Original Message----- > From: Radim Krčmář [mailto:rkrc...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 2:59 AM > To: Wu, Feng <feng...@intel.com> > Cc: pbonz...@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest- > priority interrupts > > 2016-01-25 16:53+0800, Feng Wu: > > Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts, As an > > example, modern Intel CPUs in server platform use this method to > > handle lowest-priority interrupts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng...@intel.com> > > --- > > With any proposed resolution of BUG_ON in kvm_vector_to_index, > > Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > > @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | > S_IWUSR); > > +bool __read_mostly vector_hashing = true; > > (Module param can be static.) > > > +module_param(vector_hashing, bool, S_IRUGO);
Thanks a lot for your comments, Radim & Paolo! Paolo, given that the only two comments above, do I need to send v5? Or you can handle it while merging them? I am fine with both methods. Thanks, Feng
