On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 10:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Now you are flushing the tlb twice. ptep_clear_flush clears the pte and > > flushes the tlb, ptep_establish sets the new pte and flushes the tlb. > > Not good. Use set_pte_at instead of the ptep_establish. > > Yeah, sorry, I already noticed and corrected that :-| > > Also, I'm dubious about the while thing and stuck a WARN_ON(ret) thing > at the beginning of the loop. flush_tlb_page() does IPI the other cpus > to flush their tlb too, so there should not be a SMP race, Arjan?
The while loop is protected by the pte lock and flush_tlb_page has to remove the tlbs on all cpus. So yes, I think the while loop is not necessary. -- blue skies, Martin. Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
