Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:11:29AM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote: > > This was just changed in 2.4 so that vmalloced pages are faulted in on > > demand. > > Could you explain how it handles the vmalloc() -- vfree() -- vmalloc() of same > virtual space but different physical race ? As far as I can tell (I didn't write the code), vfree didn't change. It's only vmalloc that's lazy now. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Pauline Middelink
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Ingo Oeser
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Rik van Riel
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Ingo Oeser
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. afei
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Alan Cox
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Richard B. Johnson
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. H. Peter Anvin
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Brian Gerst
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Andi Kleen
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Brian Gerst
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. kernel
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Alan Cox
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. kernel
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Tigran Aivazian
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Andi Kleen
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Tigran Aivazian
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Andi Kleen
- Re: kmalloc() allocation. Mark W. McClelland