On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> 
> This patch removes some questionable code that attempted to make a
> no-longer-used page easier to reclaim.

If so, "cancel_dirty_page()" may actually be the right thing to use, but 
only if you can guarantee that the page isn't mapped anywhere (and from 
the name of the function I guess it's not something that you'll ever map?)

So the JFS code _looks_ like you could just replace the

        clear_page_dirty(page);

with

        cancel_dirty_page(page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);

(where that second parameter is just used for statistics - it updates the 
"cancelled IO" byte-counts if CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING is set - so the 
number doesn't really matter, you could make it zero if you never want the 
thing to show up in the IO accounting).

                        Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to