3.13.11-ckt33 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> commit 79a21dbfae3cd40d5a801778071a9967b79c2c20 upstream. Intel RAPL initialized on several systems where the BIOS lock bit (msr 0x610, bit 63) was set. This occured because the return value of rapl_read_data_raw() was being checked, rather than the value of the variable passed in, locked. This patch properly implments the rapl_read_data_raw() call to check the variable locked, and now the Intel RAPL driver outputs the warning: intel_rapl: RAPL package 0 domain package locked by BIOS and does not initialize for the package. Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jacob Pan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> --- drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c index 3c67683..4048d7f 100644 --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c @@ -1194,10 +1194,13 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct rapl_package *rp, int cpu) for (rd = rp->domains; rd < rp->domains + rp->nr_domains; rd++) { /* check if the domain is locked by BIOS */ - if (rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &locked)) { + ret = rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &locked); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (locked) { pr_info("RAPL package %d domain %s locked by BIOS\n", rp->id, rd->name); - rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED; + rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED; } } -- 1.9.1
