On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 10:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I will try, but I had a look around the different architectures > implementation of ptep_clear_flush_dirty() and saw that not all do the > actual flush. So if we go down this road perhaps we should introduce > another per arch function that does the potential flush. like > flush_tlb_on_clear_dirty() or something like that.
never mind, we do need an unconditional flush for changing the protection too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
