On 2016/1/21 23:41, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
But... I think that the unflexible original code has a bug, one that makes it not work when using gcc6 :-\ So I think we should make it build in gcc6, using that patch (or does it have some other problem?) so that at least doing what we can do now can be done for those using gcc6. Then fix these shortcomings you detected.
OK. His patch does what it claims to do. Please merge it first, then let's look into my problem. Thank you.
