On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:09:05PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > 2016-01-21 Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 09:48:14AM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.pado...@collabora.co.uk> > > > > > > timeline was wrongly assigned with ->get_driver_name(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.pado...@collabora.co.uk> > > > --- > > > include/trace/events/fence.h | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/fence.h b/include/trace/events/fence.h > > > index 98feb1b..d6dfa05 100644 > > > --- a/include/trace/events/fence.h > > > +++ b/include/trace/events/fence.h > > > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(fence_annotate_wait_on, > > > > > > TP_STRUCT__entry( > > > __string(driver, fence->ops->get_driver_name(fence)) > > > - __string(timeline, fence->ops->get_driver_name(fence)) > > > + __string(timeline, fence->ops->get_timeline_name(fence)) > > > __field(unsigned int, context) > > > __field(unsigned int, seqno) > > > > Why would you send this to: me? I am not the trace maintainer... > > Because you are the original committer of the file.
I did? I have committed lots of files/patches that I am not the owner/maintainer of. > But this should have been addressed to the trace maintainer. scripts/get_maintainer.pl is your friend, please use it :) thanks, greg k-h
