OK, thanks. And I shall try to send another patches for mm within this
month.



On 2016年01月06日 06:35, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed,  6 Jan 2016 06:25:56 +0800 cheng...@emindsoft.com.cn wrote:
> 
>> The related warning:
>>
>>     LD      mm/built-in.o
>>   WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text.unlikely+0x155d): Section mismatch in 
>> reference from the function movable_node_is_enabled() to the variable 
>> .meminit.data:movable_node_enabled
>>   The function movable_node_is_enabled() references
>>   the variable __meminitdata movable_node_enabled.
>>   This is often because movable_node_is_enabled lacks a __meminitdata
>>   annotation or the annotation of movable_node_enabled is wrong.
> 
> Thanks.  Kirill just sent (almost) the same patch:
> 
> 
> 
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: memblock: fix section mismatch
> 
> allmodconfig produces following warning for me:
> 
>   WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x10314): Section mismatch in reference 
> from the function movable_node_is_enabled() to the variable 
> .meminit.data:movable_node_enabled
>   The function movable_node_is_enabled() references
>   the variable __meminitdata movable_node_enabled.
>   This is often because movable_node_is_enabled lacks a __meminitdata
>   annotation or the annotation of movable_node_enabled is wrong.
> 
> Let's mark the function with __meminit. It fixes the warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/memblock.h |   18 +++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN include/linux/memblock.h~memblock-fix-section-mismatch 
> include/linux/memblock.h
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h~memblock-fix-section-mismatch
> +++ a/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,14 @@ extern int memblock_debug;
>  extern bool movable_node_enabled;
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
> +#define __init_memblock __meminit
> +#define __initdata_memblock __meminitdata
> +#else
> +#define __init_memblock
> +#define __initdata_memblock
> +#endif
> +
>  #define memblock_dbg(fmt, ...) \
>       if (memblock_debug) printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>  
> @@ -164,7 +172,7 @@ static inline bool memblock_is_hotplugga
>       return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG;
>  }
>  
> -static inline bool movable_node_is_enabled(void)
> +static inline bool __init_memblock movable_node_is_enabled(void)
>  {
>       return movable_node_enabled;
>  }
> @@ -397,14 +405,6 @@ static inline unsigned long memblock_reg
>       for (idx = 0; idx < memblock_type->cnt;                         \
>            idx++,rgn = &memblock_type->regions[idx])
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
> -#define __init_memblock __meminit
> -#define __initdata_memblock __meminitdata
> -#else
> -#define __init_memblock
> -#define __initdata_memblock
> -#endif
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMTEST
>  extern void early_memtest(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
>  #else
> _
> 
> 

-- 
Chen Gang (陈刚)

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to