On 15-12-31 04:30:19, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 03:24:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi James,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   3bc8f29b149e ("new helper: memdup_user_nul()")
> > 
> > from the vfs tree and commit:
> > 
> >   38d859f991f3 ("IMA: policy can now be updated multiple times")
> > 
> > from the security tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (hopefully, see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > (no action is required).
>  
> > +   res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ima_write_mutex);
> > +   if (res)
> > +           return res;
> >   
> >     if (datalen >= PAGE_SIZE)
> >             datalen = PAGE_SIZE - 1;
> >   
> >     /* No partial writes. */
> > +   result = -EINVAL;
> >     if (*ppos != 0)
> > -           return -EINVAL;
> > +           goto out;
> >   
> >  -  result = -ENOMEM;
> >  -  data = kmalloc(datalen + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> >  -  if (!data)
> >  -          goto out;
> >  -
> >  -  *(data + datalen) = '\0';
> >  -
> >  -  result = -EFAULT;
> >  -  if (copy_from_user(data, buf, datalen))
> >  +  data = memdup_user_nul(buf, datalen);
> > -   if (IS_ERR(data))
> > -           return PTR_ERR(data);
> > ++  if (IS_ERR(data)) {
> > ++          result = PTR_ERR(data);
> > +           goto out;
> > ++  }
> 
> Why do it in this order?  With or without opencoding memdup_user_nul(),
> what's the point of taking the mutex before copying the data from
> userland?  All it achieves is holding it longer, over the area that
> needs no exclusion whatsoever.

I introduced the write mutex when ima_write_policy() stopped being serialized 
by 
other means.  Come to think about it the semaphore could be taken right before 
copy_from_user() so it is my fault, not Stephen's.

The patch, however, leaves out a bug where free without allocation can occur.  
Look at *ppos evaluation.  Instead of "goto out" it should be "return 
-EINVAL;".  
This requires the mutex lock to be moved down, though.


cheers,
Petko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to