On Wednesday 30 December 2015 15:24:47 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> asm-generic variant of smp_store_mb() calls mb() which is stronger
> than implied by both the name and the documentation.
> 
> smp_store_mb is only used by core kernel code at the moment, so
> we know no one mis-uses it for an MMIO barrier.
> Make it call smp_mb consistently before some arch-specific
> code uses it as such by mistake.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index 538f8d1..987b2e0 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
>  #endif       /* CONFIG_SMP */
>  
>  #ifndef smp_store_mb
> -#define smp_store_mb(var, value)  do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while 
> (0)
> +#define smp_store_mb(var, value)  do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } 
> while (0)
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifndef smp_mb__before_atomic
> 

The same patch is already in the tip tree scheduled for 4.5 as d5a73cadf3fd
("lcoking/barriers, arch: Use smp barriers in smp_store_release()").

I think you can drop your version.

        arnd

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to