> On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-09 10:26]:
> > > Unfortunately, I am lacking the knowledge needed to do this in an
> > > informed way. I am neither familiar enough with git nor do I possess
> > > the necessary C powers.
> >
> > I wonder if what you're seein is related to
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/16/73
> >
> > You said that you don't see any corruption with 2.6.18. Can you try
> > to apply the patch from
> > http://www2.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d08b3851da41d0ee60851f2c75b118e1f7a5fc89
> > to 2.6.18 to see if the corruption shows up?
>
> I did wonder about the very first hunk of Peter's patch, where the
> mapping->private_lock is unlocked earlier now in try_to_free_buffers,
> before the clear_page_dirty. I'm not at all familiar with that area,
> I wonder if Jan has looked at that change, and might be able to say
> whether it's good or not (earlier he worried about his JBD changes,
> but they wouldn't be implicated if just 2.6.18+Peter's gives trouble).
Thanks for pointer. I was not aware of this change, I'll have a look
at it on Monday. Actually Mickael has checked that he sees corruption
even if all the JBD changes are backed out so I was going to look for
other changes in VFS that could cause that.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
