From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:43:27 +0100
The return type "unsigned long" was used by the cpu_set_cclk() function
while the type "int" is provided by the clk_set_rate() function.
Let us make this usage consistent.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
index a9f8e5b..2a6f3ac 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_BF60x
-unsigned long cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
+int cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
{
struct clk *clk;
int ret;
--
2.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
