On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> 
> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration,
> > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly
> > warns:
> >
> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe':
> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 
> > 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long 
> > unsigned int}' [-Wformat=]
> >    dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start);
> >
> > This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format
> > string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we
> > the resource structure directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > v2: don't break ordering of arguments, that part was correct already, unlike
> > what I said in v1.
> 
> Patch applied with Ludovic's review tag.

I don't see this in linux-next, did the commit get lost accidentally?

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to