On 17/12/15 11:00, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 17/12/15 10:48, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Dynamically assign the irqchip structure for each GIC controller >> instance. This is necessary in order to populate the "dev" member >> of the irqchip structure for GIC instances that require runtime >> power management support. This also allows us to populate a unique >> name for each GIC controller. >> >> This is based upon a patch by Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com> > > This is going to clash horribly with the version I've pulled into my tree: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/commit/?h=irq/gic-4.5&id=58b8964990dc6b59198b25337624b8518cb1dd87 > > so you may want to have a look at this. I don't think it will affect the > work you are doing in a major may though.
Ok, great. I was wondering if this change has been queued somewhere. It is not too different from mine, however, AFAICT you could get rid of the gic_eoimode1_chip structure, as I have done, as it is mostly the same as gic_chip. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
