On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:57:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 03:41:01PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > So we have csv_sep properly initialized before
> > report command leg.
> 
> I moved this to before "perf stat report: Process stat and stat round
> events" so that what you wrote above makes sense, i.e. after this patch
> nothing is produced by 'perf stat report' and right after the stat and
> stat round one is applied I get:
> 
>   [acme@ssdandy linux]$ perf stat report
> 
>    Performance counter stats for '/home/acme/bin/perf stat record usleep 1':
> 
>           0.411636      task-clock (msec)         #    0.571 CPUs utilized    
>       
>                  2      context-switches          #    0.005 M/sec            
>       
>                  0      cpu-migrations            #    0.000 K/sec            
>       
>                149      page-faults               #    0.362 M/sec            
>       
>          1,291,807      cycles                    #    3.138 GHz              
>       
>            959,632      stalled-cycles-frontend   #   74.29% frontend cycles 
> idle   
>            703,170      stalled-cycles-backend    #   54.43% backend  cycles 
> idle   
>            757,538      instructions              #    0.59  insns per cycle  
>       
>                                                   #    1.27  stalled cycles 
> per insn
>            133,293      branches                  #  323.813 M/sec            
>       
>      <not counted>      branch-misses              (0.00%)
> 
>        0.000720394 seconds time elapsed
> 
>   [acme@ssdandy linux]$ 
> 
> And not this ugly thing:
> 
>   [acme@ssdandy linux]$ perf stat report
> 
>    Performance counter stats for '/home/acme/bin/perf stat record usleep 1':
> 
>           0.411636(null)    (null)task-clock (msec)         #    0.571 CPUs 
> utilized          
>                  2(null)    (null)context-switches          #    0.005 M/sec  
>                 
>                  0(null)    (null)cpu-migrations            #    0.000 K/sec  
>                 
>                149(null)    (null)page-faults               #    0.362 M/sec  
>                 
>          1,291,807(null)    (null)cycles                    #    3.138 GHz    
>                 
>            959,632(null)    (null)stalled-cycles-frontend   #   74.29% 
> frontend cycles idle   
>            703,170(null)    (null)stalled-cycles-backend    #   54.43% 
> backend  cycles idle   
>            757,538(null)    (null)instructions              #    0.59  insns 
> per cycle        
>                                                   #    1.27  stalled cycles 
> per insn
>            133,293(null)    (null)branches                  #  323.813 M/sec  
>                 
>      <not counted>(null)    (null)branch-misses              (0.00%)
> 
>        0.000720394 seconds time elapsed
> 
>   [acme@ssdandy linux]$

sounds good, thanks

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to