3.19.8-ckt12 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Mathias Krause <[email protected]>

commit 3dcc8d39cf15fa3ceabedcffcbd3958fe953555a upstream.

Commit 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node
override") missed that the user-provided node could also be negative.
Handle this case as well to avoid out-of-bounds accesses to the
node_states[] array.  However, allow the special value -1, i.e.
NUMA_NO_NODE, to be able to set the 'no specific node' configuration.

Fixes: 1266963170f5 ("PCI: Prevent out of bounds access in numa_node override")
Fixes: 63692df103e9 ("PCI: Allow numa_node override via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
CC: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
CC: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
index 9261868..eead54c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
@@ -216,7 +216,10 @@ static ssize_t numa_node_store(struct device *dev,
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
-       if (node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node))
+       if ((node < 0 && node != NUMA_NO_NODE) || node >= MAX_NUMNODES)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE && !node_online(node))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        add_taint(TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to