On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 04:15:39PM +0800, Songjun Wu wrote: > Add driver for the Pulse Density Modulation Interface > Controller. It comes with digitallly controlled gain, > a High-Pass and a SINCC filter.
This looks basically OK but there's a *lot* of weird coding style issues
in here. It's really all that, nothing too serious that I noticed -
I've pointed out some of the patterns below not every individual issue.
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mic_gain_table); i++) {
> + if ((mic_gain_table[i].dgain == dgain_val)
> + && (mic_gain_table[i].scale == scale_val))
> + ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = i;
> + }
This indentation is really weird, why is the && aligned with the if?
> + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, PDMIC_DSPR1,
> + PDMIC_DSPR1_OFFSET_MASK,
> + (u32)(dd->pdata->mic_offset << PDMIC_DSPR1_OFFSET_SHIFT));
These are weird too, I'd expect the second line to be part of the first.
> +static struct regmap *atmel_pdmic_codec_get_remap(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return dev_get_regmap(dev, NULL);
> +}
This is (or should be) the default in the core.
> + if ((fs < rate_min) || (fs > rate_max)) {
> + dev_err(codec->dev,
> + "sample rate is %dHz, min rate is %dHz, max rate is %dHz\n",
> + fs, rate_min, rate_max);
This too, alignment after the (.
> + if (bits == 16)
> + dspr0_val = (PDMIC_DSPR0_SIZE_16_BITS
> + << PDMIC_DSPR0_SIZE_SHIFT);
> + else if (bits == 32)
> + dspr0_val = (PDMIC_DSPR0_SIZE_32_BITS
> + << PDMIC_DSPR0_SIZE_SHIFT);
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
This looks like it should be a switch statement.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
