On 12/11/2015 11:09 AM, William Cohen wrote:
On 12/11/2015 12:05 AM, David Long wrote:
There is a moderate amount of code already in kprobes on ARM and the current
ARMv8 patch to deal with conditional execution of instructions. One aspect of
how this is handled is that instructions that fail their predicate and are not
(technically) executed are also not treated as a hit kprobe. Steve Capper has
suggested that the probe handling should still take place because we stepped
through the instruction even if it was effectively a nop. This would be a
significant change in how it currently works on 32-bit ARM, and a change in the
patch for ARMv8 (although it's not likely to be much of a change in the kernel
code).
I need input on this. Do people have opinions?
-dl
Hi Dave,
Conditionally executing the kprobes would violate the assumptions made for perf
and systemtap collecting data. Even if the instruction is predicated and
treated as a NOP it should still reliably trigger the kprobe. However, for
efficiency the simulation/emulation/single-step of the instruction could be
skipped if the instruction is known to have no change on the machine state
other than changing the program counter.
-Will Cohen
I wonder if this might explain some systemtap failures.
-dl
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
