On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: >> If I recall the c2c tool is giving you more than the bouncing line. It shows >> you >> the offset inside the line and the participating CPUs. > > On Haswell and later you could get the same with the normal address > reporting. The events above support DLA. > I know the events track the condition better than just with the latency threshold. I think what it boils down to is not so much the PMU side but rather the tool side. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of pe... Jiri Olsa
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status ... Wangnan (F)
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status ... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current sta... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current sta... Joe Mario
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current sta... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current sta... Andi Kleen
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current... Stephane Eranian
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the cur... Andi Kleen
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's th... Stephane Eranian
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the cur... Joe Mario
- Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's th... Yunlong Song