On 08/12/15 16:12, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:03:55 +0000 Harvey Hunt <harvey.h...@imgtec.com> wrote:static void jz4780_nand_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl) { struct jz4780_nand_chip *nand = to_jz4780_nand_chip(mtd); struct jz4780_nand_controller *nfc = to_jz4780_nand_controller(nand->chip.controller); struct jz4780_nand_cs *cs; if (WARN_ON(nfc->selected < 0)) return; cs = &nfc->cs[nfc->selected]; if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) { if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE) { if (ctrl & NAND_ALE) writeb(cmd, cs->base + OFFSET_ADDR); else if (ctrl & NAND_CLE) writeb(cmd, cs->base + OFFSET_CMD); } jz4780_nemc_assert(nfc->dev, cs->bank, ctrl & NAND_NCE); } }Okay, I understand your point now. I would also have to implement the read/write functions to replace the defaults, correct? If so, it feels strange to add functions to reimplement the default ones.I don't think you have to re-implement the {read,write}_{byte,buf,word} functions, because you'll still assign the ->IO_ADDR_W and ->IO_ADDR_R fields to cs->base + OFFSET_DATA in jz4780_nand_init_chip(), but maybe I'm missing something.
You're right, I forgot about that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
