Stefan Wahren <i...@lategoodbye.de> writes: > Hi Remi, > > Am 07.12.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Remi Pommarel: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 10:16:25PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote: >>> Hi Remi, >>> >>> please send this patch to devicet...@vger.kernel.org. >> >> Ok, just to be sure I understand the process here. I should resend a new >> version of the whole patchset including the devicetree mailing list as >> recipent. Then the first 3 patches will eventually get pushed by a clock >> subsystem maintainer. And finally this last patch will be pushed by a >> devicetree maintainer. >> >> Am I right here ? > > sorry for the confusion. I mean that you send a copy to > devicet...@vger.kernel.org so subscribers have a chance to review. > > I'm not sure but according to your subject you suggest that this dts > patch should go through clock subsystem which isn't optimal. This should > be better applied by Stephen or Eric.
It would be applied by me, but that's for me to worry about, not the patch submitter. The subject prefix would be "ARM: bcm2835: ", but that's trivial for me to fix when applying, not the kind of thing worth asking for a respin for.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
