Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled:
use the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places)
of "alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc
code, which originated that reporting API).

Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate
status, and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state.
We really don't want every RTC driver doing their own thing here...

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c |    5 +++--
 drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c       |    3 +--
 drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c       |    2 +-
 drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c        |    6 ++----
 drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c     |    4 +---
 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c     2006-12-12 11:25:07.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c  2006-12-12 11:25:41.000000000 -0800
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file
                        seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday);
                else
                        seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
-               seq_printf(seq, "alrm_wakeup\t: %s\n",
+               seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
                                alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
                seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
                                alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
Index: g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c       2006-12-12 11:13:18.000000000 
-0800
+++ g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c    2006-12-12 11:25:41.000000000 -0800
@@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ static int at91_rtc_readalarm(struct dev
        tm->tm_yday = rtc_year_days(tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_year);
        tm->tm_year = at91_alarm_year - 1900;
 
+       alrm->enabled = (at91_sys_read(AT91_RTC_IMR) & AT91_RTC_ALARM)
+                       ? 1 : 0;
+
        pr_debug("%s(): %4d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", __FUNCTION__,
                1900 + tm->tm_year, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_mday,
                tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
@@ -223,8 +226,6 @@ static int at91_rtc_proc(struct device *
 {
        unsigned long imr = at91_sys_read(AT91_RTC_IMR);
 
-       seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
-                       (imr & AT91_RTC_ALARM) ? "yes" : "no");
        seq_printf(seq, "update_IRQ\t: %s\n",
                        (imr & AT91_RTC_ACKUPD) ? "yes" : "no");
        seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n",
Index: g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c      2006-12-12 11:08:08.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c   2006-12-12 11:25:41.000000000 -0800
@@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static int s3c_rtc_getalarm(struct devic
 
        alm_en = readb(base + S3C2410_RTCALM);
 
+       alrm->enabled = (alm_en & S3C2410_RTCALM_ALMEN) ? 1 : 0;
+
        pr_debug("read alarm %02x %02x.%02x.%02x %02x/%02x/%02x\n",
                 alm_en,
                 alm_tm->tm_year, alm_tm->tm_mon, alm_tm->tm_mday,
@@ -331,12 +333,8 @@ static int s3c_rtc_ioctl(struct device *
 
 static int s3c_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
 {
-       unsigned int rtcalm = readb(s3c_rtc_base + S3C2410_RTCALM);
        unsigned int ticnt = readb(s3c_rtc_base + S3C2410_TICNT);
 
-       seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
-                  (rtcalm & S3C2410_RTCALM_ALMEN) ? "yes" : "no" );
-
        seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n",
                     (ticnt & S3C2410_TICNT_ENABLE) ? "yes" : "no" );
 
Index: g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c   2006-12-12 11:08:08.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c        2006-12-12 11:25:41.000000000 -0800
@@ -289,9 +289,7 @@ static int sa1100_rtc_set_alarm(struct d
 
 static int sa1100_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
 {
-       seq_printf(seq, "trim/divider\t: 0x%08lx\n", RTTR);
-       seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
-                       (RTSR & RTSR_ALE) ? "yes" : "no" );
+       seq_printf(seq, "trim/divider\t: 0x%08x\n", (u32) RTTR);
        seq_printf(seq, "update_IRQ\t: %s\n",
                        (RTSR & RTSR_HZE) ? "yes" : "no");
        seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n",
Index: g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
===================================================================
--- g26.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c     2006-12-12 11:08:08.000000000 -0800
+++ g26/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c  2006-12-12 11:25:41.000000000 -0800
@@ -279,9 +279,8 @@ static int omap_rtc_read_alarm(struct de
        local_irq_enable();
 
        bcd2tm(&alm->time);
-       alm->pending = !!(rtc_read(OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG)
+       alm->enabled = !!(rtc_read(OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG)
                        & OMAP_RTC_INTERRUPTS_IT_ALARM);
-       alm->enabled = alm->pending && device_may_wakeup(dev);
 
        return 0;
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to