On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:22:40PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:51:04PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I'm mostly interested in it because it's the only ARMv7 platform that is > > left after my other patches, and I just want to be done with it after > > spending 5 years on it ;-) > > My understanding is that the long term goal is to delete mach-dove once > everyone has settled down into the mvebu DT world. > > Right now we have mvebu which covers Dove using DT. We have mach-dove > which is legacy non-DT Dove. > > It seems to me to be completely crazy to want to bring legacy code, which > is ultimately destined to be deleted, into multiplatform.
I agree. We have multiplatform dove already, it is in mach-mvebu. Do we really need both mach-dove and mach-mvebu dove in one kernel? Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
