In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:45:13 +0200, > Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Would it be possible to keep 2.7.2.3? You still need 2.7.2.3 to > >reliably compile 2.0.X (and maybe even 2.2.all-but-latest?). > > You can have multiple versions of gcc installed, just select the one to > use when you compile the kernel. > > CC=gcc-2723 make 2.0 kernel > CC=gcc-2723 make 2.2 kernel > CC=egcs make 2.4 kernel No, environment doesn't override make variables by default. This works on any shell: make CC=egcs <targets> Rusty. -- Hacking time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] 2.4 Changes update (was Re: [p... Paul Gortmaker
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous rant) Andrew Morton
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous rant) Pavel Machek
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous r... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous r... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous r... Keith Owens
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuito... Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus grat... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus ... Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuito... Rusty Russell
- Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus grat... Peter Samuelson
- Recommended compiler? - Re: [patch... Linux Kernel Developer
- Re: Recommended compiler? - R... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Recommended compiler? - R... Martin Dalecki
- Re: Recommended compiler? - R... Horst von Brand
- Re: Recommended compiler? - R... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Recommended compiler? - R... Martin Dalecki