On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 19:54 +0000, Russell King wrote: > > > what if the irq got disabled meanwhile? Also, chip->enable is a > > > compatibility method, not something we should use in a flow handler. > > > > I don't know how other arches deal with IRQ_PENDING, but ARM (OMAP at > > least) disables the IRQ on IRQ_PENDING. > > Please point out where it's doing that, and I'll take a look to see > if it's doing something it shouldn't.
It's in arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c . It uses the lowlevel function to disable the interrupt, not chip->disable() . In gpio_irq_handler() . Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
