* Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ...
> > @@ -1212,7 +1244,8 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *
> >     hash_head = classhashentry(key);
> >  
> >     raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > -   __raw_spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> > +   if (!graph_lock())
> 
>       ! raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> 
> > +           return NULL;

yeah. Fix below.

        Ingo

Subject: [patch] lockdep: fix possible race while disabling lock-debugging, 
restore fix
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

restore flags in failure branch, pointed out by Jarek Poplawski.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 kernel/lockdep.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1244,8 +1244,10 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *
        hash_head = classhashentry(key);
 
        raw_local_irq_save(flags);
-       if (!graph_lock())
+       if (!graph_lock()) {
+               raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
                return NULL;
+       }
        /*
         * We have to do the hash-walk again, to avoid races
         * with another CPU:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to